Dauda’s Triumph: Saluting The Courage Of The Judiciary
By Nicholas Dekera
THE Judiciary, often touted as the last resort of the common man has always been an arm of government with a chequered history. Parties to issues brought before the lord justices are always hopeful of favourable outcomes and are, in fact, heavily invested in these expectations. Even in cases where the layman may dismiss as unworthy of adjudication, the judiciary is still expected to sit, decide and make legal pronouncements.
These expectations are even higher in election cases. In Nigeria, despite a very long and rich history of electoral jurisprudence, the judiciary is always put on trial anew after every round of elections. This is despite the Supreme Court reiterating that: “There is in law a rebuttable presumption that the result of any election declared by the returning officer is correct and authentic”(Omoboriowo v. Ajasin).
That presumption was on Monday, September 18, 2023, ratified when the Zamfara Governorship Election Tribunal upheld the election of Dauda Lawal Dare of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, as the validly elected Governor of Zamfara State. Delivering judgement, the Chairman of the tribunal, Cordelia Ogadi, also said the petitioner failed to prove the claim that the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, didn’t comply with electoral rules while conducting the election.
Although not surprising, this outcome is enough reason for Nigerians in general and the people of Zamfara to restate their hopes on the judiciary. This is because the Cordelia Ogadi-led panel of justices stood firm to deliver that judgement in the face of revelations of attempted inducements of the panel by elements known to be apologists of some interested parties. In fact, like the controversial billboard inscripted with ‘all eyes on the judiciary’ reflecting on the Presidential Election Tribunal, Zamfara purported audio clip hugely beclouding the tribunal with suspicions caused uproar and several narratives in the media as well as accusations and counter-accusations by the parties concerned.
Indeed, Zamfara State can be said to be a favourite of the judiciary, maybe more than any state in Nigeria. The state and Governor Dauda Lawal Dare have continued to benefit from the dispassionate, firm, audacious, unapologetic, and indeed unbiased interpretation of Nigeria’s electoral laws by justices that have handled electoral matters for Zamfara State. In March of 2019, an Appeal Court sitting in Zamfara overturned the decision of a lower court which upheld the election of the APC despite glaring evidence that the party didn’t hold any primaries.
In the judgement, which was adopted by two other judges in the panel – Tijjani Abubakar and Jamilu Tukur – Justice Tom Yakubu held that the lower court failed to perform its duty to properly evaluate the evidence before it. Again, on May 24 of the same year, a five-man panel of the Supreme Court affirmed the decision made by the appeal court, to the effect that the APC did not hold any valid primary election and could not have contested and be declared winners in an election it didn’t present candidates for.
While delivering a unanimous judgement of the five-man panel led by the acting Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Tanko Muhammad, the apex court declared the first runners-up in the 2019 general elections in the state as the winners of all the posts earlier declared to have been won by the APC and its candidates. Ironically, the appellant, Bello Matawalle, was the beneficiary of that example of excellent adjudication and not even the request for the Supreme Court to review itself brought any reprieve to the APC.
Governor Dare himself has been through the highs and lows of the judiciary. But, like a phoenix rising from the ashes, he emerged from the debris of opposition orchestrated frivolous court filings to win the 2023 election. I believe it is on the strength of this that he had kept faith with the Cordelia Ogadi-led tribunal and it gladdens the heart that the panel of justices stood firm to deliver a judgement that was not only met popular expectation, but is also the right call.
Whereas the case is still open since the appellant reserves the right of appeal, it comes off as really frivolous for someone who confessed to have lost the election, albeit through Federal Government’s might – whatever that means – to turn around now and claim that he won. He may have hidden under the party which was roundly beaten to go to court but since the courts deal only with facts, there’s no surprise why they lost so fantastically.
The streets of Gusau will not even lose any sleep over this declaration. Everyone already knew that the suit amounted to the wild thrashing of an already drowned party and its candidate. It’s still left to be seen whether they’ll dig into whatever reserve of honour they have left to move on from this embarrassing pursuit. Perhaps, that may still fetch them some sympathy from the people.
Related News
Zamfara specialist hospital gets new Medical Director
Hostage Swap: Tension in Zamfara community as monarch orders release of bandits’ wives
Zamfara NMA suspends strike
Dekera, a journalist wrote from Kaduna
